Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

17
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
72% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Advanced Super Intelligence on X

Discontinuing it so he can then... pic.twitter.com/Ib5Bay6YGj

Posted by Advanced Super Intelligence
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 2/5
No presentation of only two extreme options; too vague for dilemmas.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 2/5
Mild us-vs-them hint in 'he' implying Elon critique, but no explicit tribal dynamics.
Simplistic Narratives 3/5
Implies simplistic motive ('Discontinuing it so he can then...') reducing complex business decision to conspiracy.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Posted hours after Tesla's Jan 28, 2026 earnings call announcing Model S/X discontinuation, as widely reported by Electrek and Verge; organic response with no suspicious ties to other events like winter storms.
Historical Parallels 2/5
Minor resemblance to Tesla FUD patterns around product changes, but no links to propaganda playbooks like state-sponsored ops per searches.
Financial/Political Gain 1/5
Vague reply to pro-Tesla Sawyer Merritt's factual post; no identifiable beneficiaries like short sellers or campaigns, just standard coverage of Tesla's Optimus pivot.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No claims that 'everyone agrees' or pressure to join consensus; isolated vague comment.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
Timely reply to breaking Tesla news with natural engagement; no astroturfing or sudden discourse shifts in X reactions.
Phrase Repetition 2/5
Factual discontinuation reported uniformly across media from earnings call, but content's conspiratorial 'so he can then...' is unique amid diverse reactions.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Implies unstated causal fallacy in 'so he can then...' without evidence.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts or authorities cited; relies on unstated assumptions.
Cherry-Picked Data 1/5
No data presented at all, let alone selective.
Framing Techniques 3/5
Biased conspiratorial framing via ellipsis '...' suggesting hidden sinister intent behind 'Discontinuing it'.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No labeling of critics or suppression; no dissent mentioned.
Context Omission 4/5
Omits context like 'it' (Model S/X), 'he' (Elon Musk), and announcement details, leaving audience to infer from thread.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
No claims of unprecedented or shocking events; references a corporate announcement without novelty hype.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional words or phrases; single short sentence with no repetition.
Manufactured Outrage 2/5
No outrage expressed or incited; lacks disconnection from facts as it vaguely alludes to known Tesla news without hyperbolic reaction.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for immediate action or response; content is an elliptical statement without calls to share, act, or decide.
Emotional Triggers 2/5
No fear, outrage, or guilt language present; the vague phrase 'Discontinuing it so he can then...' lacks emotional triggers.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Appeal to fear-prejudice Bandwagon Reductio ad hitlerum
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else