Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

27
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
79% confidence
Moderate manipulation indicators. Some persuasion patterns present.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

X Notification ⭐️ on X

🚀 Big News! #ElonMusk has officially launched X Token.🎉 @LongCarmen10137 @MagnusJonsson @GlennlyD85842 https://t.co/OKM7sWbIkH

Posted by X Notification ⭐️
Linked Content
https://x.com/i/communities/2008553733056073985?2786f297-5119-4f56-a573-950ee73c70d9
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No presentation of only two extreme options; just a standalone claim.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No 'us vs. them' dynamics or group conflicts; neutral claim without division.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
No good vs. evil framing; simple factual assertion without moral binaries.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Searches show no correlation with major events like Federal Reserve subpoenas or Ukraine attacks; scam posts appear organically in ongoing campaign unrelated to real X developments like cashtags.
Historical Parallels 5/5
Exact replica of 'X Token Presale Scam' on PCRisk and Elon impersonation frauds using fake endorsements, as reported on Reddit and AARP.
Financial/Political Gain 5/5
Promotes fake X Token presale scam benefiting anonymous fraudsters via phishing; Elon Musk denied token plans, matching documented crypto scams with zero-follower promoter accounts.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No claims that 'everyone agrees' or widespread adoption; isolated announcement without social proof.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 4/5
Cluster of bot-like promo posts Jan 9-11 pushes presale hype amid scam warnings, showing manufactured momentum via fake accounts.
Phrase Repetition 5/5
Identical phrasing across bot posts, e.g., 'X Token Pre-Sale Starts Today! #ElonMusk', all linking to same scam community, indicating coordination.
Logical Fallacies 1/5
No arguments or reasoning to contain fallacies; pure assertion.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts or authorities cited; relies solely on '#ElonMusk' name without verification.
Cherry-Picked Data 1/5
No data or statistics presented at all, selective or otherwise.
Framing Techniques 2/5
Hype framing via '🚀 Big News! 🎉' and emojis biases toward excitement, but mildly promotional without strong distortion.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No mention of critics or labeling of dissenters; lacks any counterarguments.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits all details on what X Token is, launch evidence, or official sources; broken link provides no substance, fueling false narrative.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
No 'unprecedented' or 'shocking' claims beyond generic 'Big News!'; standard promotional phrasing without exaggeration.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional words or phrases; single use of emojis and hype without reinforcement.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage expressed or evoked; content is purely celebratory without any anger or controversy.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for immediate action or pressure; merely announces 'has officially launched' with a link, lacking calls to buy or act now.
Emotional Triggers 1/5
No fear, outrage, or guilt language present; content uses neutral excitement like '🚀 Big News! 🎉' without emotional triggers.

Identified Techniques

Causal Oversimplification Loaded Language Appeal to fear-prejudice Name Calling, Labeling Exaggeration, Minimisation

What to Watch For

Consider why this is being shared now. What events might it be trying to influence?
This messaging appears coordinated. Look for independent sources with different framing.

This content shows some manipulation indicators. Consider the source and verify key claims.

Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else