Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

19
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
66% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
Iranian media publish fake graphic on Australian fuel supply | AAP
Aapfactcheck

Iranian media publish fake graphic on Australian fuel supply | AAP

An Iranian news outlet linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard is sharing disinformation about Australian fuel reserves.

View original →

Perspectives

Both analyses agree that the story centers on Australia’s fuel reserves, but they diverge on its credibility. The critical perspective flags alarmist language, a halved reserve figure and Iranian‑linked publishing as manipulation, while the supportive perspective points to official government data, a verifiable SBS graphic and an accredited fact‑check as evidence of authenticity. Weighing the concrete citations from the supportive side against the more general accusations of the critical side leads to a modest manipulation rating.

Key Points

  • The claim of only 18 days of petrol is contradicted by official DCCEEW data showing about 36‑37 days, a discrepancy highlighted by both sides.
  • The graphic’s provenance can be traced to an SBS chart; the critical view says it was altered, the supportive view confirms the original exists and the alteration is evident.
  • The article’s source (Tasnim News) has known IRGC links, which raises suspicion, but the content itself includes citations to Australian officials and an IFN‑accredited fact‑check, reducing the likelihood of outright fabrication.

Further Investigation

  • Obtain the original SBS graphic and compare pixel‑by‑pixel with the version used by Tasnim to confirm any alteration.
  • Verify the DCCEEW fuel‑reserve figures for the dates cited and check whether any official statements mention a 18‑day figure.
  • Examine the timing of the Tasnim article relative to Middle‑East events to assess whether the publication date was strategically chosen.

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No explicit binary choice is presented; the article simply corrects the false graphic.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 2/5
The narrative subtly pits “Iranian state‑aligned media” against “Australian officials,” framing a us‑vs‑them dynamic between Iran and Australia.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
The story reduces a complex energy‑security issue to a single figure—“18 days of petrol”—without exploring broader supply factors.
Timing Coincidence 2/5
Published on March 15, the story coincided with heightened coverage of U.S.–Israeli strikes on Iran and precedes Australia’s May election, suggesting a modest temporal link to ongoing geopolitical tensions rather than a targeted domestic distraction.
Historical Parallels 3/5
The use of an edited official graphic mirrors earlier Iranian propaganda efforts that altered visual data to create panic, similar to documented Russian IRA tactics of fabricating resource‑scarcity narratives.
Financial/Political Gain 3/5
The misinformation originates from Tasnim News, an outlet tied to Iran’s IRGC, which benefits politically by casting doubt on an allied nation’s energy security during a period of Middle‑East conflict; no direct financial beneficiary was identified.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
The article notes that the graphic “is being shared widely on Facebook and X,” but it does not claim that a majority believes the story, limiting any bandwagon pressure.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 2/5
A brief surge of shares was observed, yet no trending hashtags or bot‑driven amplification were found, indicating only a mild push for rapid public attention.
Phrase Repetition 2/5
The false claim was mainly circulated by Tasnim News and then shared on social media; other news outlets only reported the fact‑check, indicating limited coordinated messaging across independent sources.
Logical Fallacies 1/5
The claim implies that halved reserve numbers mean an imminent crisis, which is a slippery‑slope assumption not supported by the broader data.
Authority Overload 1/5
The article cites the Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water (DCCEEW) and the Australian Energy Minister, but does not overload the reader with expert opinions; it relies on official statements.
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
The false graphic selectively halves the official reserve numbers, presenting only the lower figures while ignoring the full data set that shows higher reserves.
Framing Techniques 2/5
The headline “WHAT WAS CLAIMED” versus “OUR VERDICT” frames the story as a myth‑busting piece, guiding readers toward the fact‑check conclusion.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
There is no labeling of critics or dissenting voices; the article focuses on correcting misinformation.
Context Omission 3/5
The piece omits context about Australia’s total fuel imports and the ongoing replenishment of reserves, which would clarify that the nation is not facing an imminent shortage.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
The claim is presented as a new revelation, but the story relies on a single altered graphic rather than novel evidence.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
The phrase “only 18 days of petrol” appears once; there is no repeated emotional trigger throughout the text.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
The content does not generate outrage beyond the factual correction of the false graphic.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
There is no explicit demand for immediate public action; the piece simply states the false claim and refutes it.
Emotional Triggers 2/5
The article uses alarmist language like “only 18 days of petrol” and “Australia has 2 weeks of fuel left,” which can provoke fear, but the overall tone remains factual rather than overtly emotive.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Exaggeration, Minimisation Appeal to fear-prejudice Slogans Flag-Waving
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else