Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

47
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
65% confidence
Moderate manipulation indicators. Some persuasion patterns present.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Throw Away on X

Its not just about bikinis and you know it mr truthteller It should be really easy to take a stand against CSAM and criticise your master who profits off it But, the pedophile right will not do that pic.twitter.com/GrGjJEBklY

Posted by Throw Away
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 4/5
Presents binary: easily 'take a stand against CSAM' or join 'pedophile right'; overlooks middle-ground views on AI vs. grooming gangs.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 4/5
'Pedophile right' pits 'us' (anti-CSAM stand-takers) against 'them' (right unwilling to criticize 'master'), heightening partisan rift.
Simplistic Narratives 4/5
Reduces debate to right's refusal to 'criticise your master' as proof of pedophilia protection, ignoring platform nuances.
Timing Coincidence 3/5
Posted January 13 amid Grok AI scandal generating bikini/CSAM images (news Jan 6-12, Ofcom probe), responding to MPs quitting X hypocrisy on grooming gangs; moderate correlation warrants scrutiny but appears organic to platform debate.
Historical Parallels 2/5
'Pedophile right' echoes bipartisan slurs in culture wars, superficially similar to ad hominem tactics but not matching documented psyops like IRA playbooks.
Financial/Political Gain 3/5
Targets 'your master who profits off it' (Elon Musk/X via Grok), bolstering left critique of right; ideological alignment evident but no clear paid ops or specific beneficiaries.
Bandwagon Effect 2/5
No appeals to widespread agreement or 'everyone knows' the right protects pedophiles; isolated personal attack.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 2/5
Grok controversy fueled recent posts, but no astroturfing, urgency, or manufactured trends pressuring viewpoint change.
Phrase Repetition 2/5
Grok CSAM complaints widespread on X, but this uses unique 'mr truthteller' sarcasm without identical phrasing or outlet coordination.
Logical Fallacies 4/5
Ad hominem 'pedophile right,' guilt-by-association with 'master,' and strawmanning bikini defense as CSAM tolerance.
Authority Overload 1/5
No citations of experts, officials, or data; pure opinion-based accusation.
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
No data or examples provided; unsubstantiated profit/CSAM link.
Framing Techniques 4/5
Derogatory 'mr truthteller' (ironic), 'pedophile right,' 'your master' bias opponents as deceitful enablers.
Suppression of Dissent 2/5
Sarcastic 'mr truthteller' dismisses opponent mildly, without broad critic-smearing.
Context Omission 4/5
Ignores replied-to context of MPs' grooming gang votes and specifics on X's CSAM moderation efforts.
Novelty Overuse 2/5
No hyperbolic 'unprecedented' or 'shocking' claims; frames CSAM stance as straightforward without novelty exaggeration.
Emotional Repetition 2/5
Single use of 'pedophile' trigger with no repeated emotional appeals or escalating rhetoric.
Manufactured Outrage 4/5
Slaps 'pedophile right' label without evidence tying the group to CSAM, manufacturing moral panic disconnected from specific facts.
Urgent Action Demands 2/5
Mild suggestion that 'It should be really easy to take a stand against CSAM,' but lacks direct commands or time pressure for audience action.
Emotional Triggers 4/5
Phrases like 'pedophile right' and 'your master who profits off it' invoke disgust, outrage, and betrayal to emotionally charge the accusation against political opponents.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Appeal to fear-prejudice Reductio ad hitlerum Whataboutism, Straw Men, Red Herring

What to Watch For

Notice the emotional language used - what concrete facts support these claims?
Consider why this is being shared now. What events might it be trying to influence?
This content frames an 'us vs. them' narrative. Consider perspectives from 'the other side'.
Key context may be missing. What questions does this content NOT answer?

This content shows some manipulation indicators. Consider the source and verify key claims.

Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else