Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

19
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
61% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Robert Youssef on X

Your premium AI bundle to 10x your business → Prompts for marketing & business → Unlimited custom prompts → n8n automations → Pay once, own forever Grab it today 👇 https://t.co/PN6rJJxxva

Posted by Robert Youssef
Linked Content
https://www.godofprompt.ai/complete-ai-bundle
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No presentation of only two extreme options; offers product details without binary choices.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No us vs. them dynamics; inclusive tone with 'empower everyone' and 'Join me on this exciting adventure'.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
No good vs. evil framing; presents balanced personal journey from 'struggling to find new clients' to success via AI.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Timing appears organic with no suspicious links to major events like Syrian conflicts or US protests (Jan 10-13, 2026); aligns naturally with AI news such as Anthropic's Cowork launch.
Historical Parallels 2/5
Minor parallels to AI prompt selling criticized as scams on Reddit, but lacks resemblance to propaganda techniques or state-sponsored patterns.
Financial/Political Gain 4/5
Strong financial benefit to God of Prompt and Alex, promoting their 'Complete AI Bundle' for one-time purchase with lifetime updates; some scam claims on Reddit but refuted with positive Trustpilot feedback.
Bandwagon Effect 2/5
No claims that 'everyone agrees' or widespread adoption; focuses on personal story like 'I used to be a freelance digital marketer struggling'.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No pressure for immediate opinion change or manufactured momentum; lacks trending hashtags, bots, or astroturfing evidence from searches.
Phrase Repetition 3/5
Identical promo text repeated verbatim across @godofprompt and related accounts like @alex_prompter, suggesting internal coordination but no external independent sources.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Some hype like implying universal success 'achieve their dreams' from prompts alone, but mostly descriptive.
Authority Overload 2/5
Relies on self-claimed expertise 'Alex from God of Prompt' without external questionable experts.
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
Selective claims like 'Save 20 hours per week' without supporting evidence or comparisons.
Framing Techniques 3/5
Biased positive language like 'premium AI bundle to 10x your business' and 'God of Prompt' frames it as essential and superior.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No labeling of critics; focuses solely on positive self-narrative.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits specifics like exact pricing beyond 'Pay once, own forever', refund details are mentioned but limited to 7 days, and no independent verification of '30,000+ prompts' efficacy.
Novelty Overuse 2/5
Claims like 'cutting-edge products' and 'unlock AI's full potential' are present but not overused or framed as unprecedented shocks.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional words or phrases; the text focuses on features like '30,000+ advanced AI Prompts' without redundancy.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage is manufactured or disconnected from facts; it is straightforward marketing without criticism or controversy.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
Only a mild 'Grab it today 👇' appears, with no strong demands or time-limited pressure beyond standard sales language.
Emotional Triggers 1/5
No fear, outrage, or guilt language is used; the content employs positive hype like '10x your business' and 'Save 20 hours per week' without emotional triggers.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Repetition Doubt Exaggeration, Minimisation
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else