Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

18
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
61% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Robert Youssef on X

Your premium AI bundle to 10x your business → Prompts for marketing & business → Unlimited custom prompts → n8n automations → Pay once, own forever Grab it today 👇 https://t.co/PN6rJJwZFC

Posted by Robert Youssef
Linked Content
https://www.godofprompt.ai/complete-ai-bundle
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No binary choices presented; offers bundle as one option among AI tools without extremes.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No us vs. them dynamics; inclusive tone 'empower everyone, no matter the technical skill' without division.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
No good vs. evil framing; straightforward sales pitch on AI prompts for tasks like 'generate blog posts' and 'business plans.'
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Timing appears organic amid ongoing AI developments like Anthropic's Cowork launch on Jan 12, with no correlation to major non-AI news events from Jan 10-13 such as Syrian clashes or US protests, nor historical disinformation patterns.
Historical Parallels 1/5
No resemblance to known propaganda like Russian IRA or state AI disinfo campaigns; searches show unrelated AI misinformation examples, not commercial prompt bundle sales.
Financial/Political Gain 4/5
Strong financial benefit to 'God of Prompt' creators Alex and team via godofprompt.ai sales, with identical promos across their X accounts; mixed reviews but no political beneficiaries or disguised operations evident.
Bandwagon Effect 2/5
Mild implication of widespread success via personal anecdote 'I used to be a freelance digital marketer struggling,' but no 'everyone agrees' claims or testimonials.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No urgency or pressure for opinion change; promo allows casual consideration without astroturfing, trending hashtags, or sudden discourse shifts detected on X.
Phrase Repetition 3/5
Moderate coordination within @godofprompt ecosystem using verbatim promo text in recent posts, but no evidence of independent sources or inauthentic behavior across outlets.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Mild hasty generalization from personal experience to 'harness the full power of AI'; no major flaws.
Authority Overload 2/5
Relies on self as 'Alex from God of Prompt' with personal story, no external questionable experts cited.
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
Vague claims like 'Save 20 hours per week' without evidence or comparisons; selective success story.
Framing Techniques 3/5
Biased sales language like 'Pay once, own forever' and '10x your business' frames product positively, emphasizing benefits over limitations.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No mention of critics; focuses on positive self-narrative without labeling dissenters.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits specifics on prompt quality, examples, or n8n automation details; claims '30,000+ advanced AI Prompts' without samples or verification.
Novelty Overuse 2/5
'Cutting-edge products' mentioned once, but no excessive 'unprecedented' or 'shocking' claims; focuses on standard AI prompts for business tasks.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional words or triggers; content is factual sales description without emphatic repetition.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage at all, factual or otherwise; personal story of 'freelance digital marketer struggling' is mild backstory without disconnection from facts.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for immediate action beyond casual 'Grab it today'; offers a 7-day refund with no pressure tactics.
Emotional Triggers 1/5
No fear, outrage, or guilt language present; promotional phrases like 'Save 20 hours per week' and '10x your business' use mild enthusiasm without emotional triggers.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Repetition Doubt Exaggeration, Minimisation
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else