Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

14
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
71% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Hans Bjärstål 🇫🇷🇸🇪 on X

@grok Är detta AI?

Posted by Hans Bjärstål 🇫🇷🇸🇪
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No binary extremes presented; open-ended question.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 2/5
Neutral address to @grok with no us-vs-them dynamics.
Simplistic Narratives 2/5
No good-vs-evil framing; mere yes/no inquiry.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Timing appears organic as searches show no link to Jan 9-12 2026 events like Syrian clashes or US news; phrase used sporadically by users checking media authenticity over months.
Historical Parallels 1/5
No matches to known campaigns; general AI misinformation concerns exist but this benign query doesn't resemble psyops or propaganda playbooks.
Financial/Political Gain 1/5
No beneficiaries identified; searches reveal no political or financial interests tied to this common user query across unrelated posts.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No suggestions that 'everyone agrees' or social proof; standalone question.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No pressure for opinion change; searches show no trends, bots, or amplified momentum around this query.
Phrase Repetition 1/5
Unique per context despite similar phrasing in isolated posts; no evidence of coordination or shared talking points from searches.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Simple query without arguments or flawed reasoning.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts or authorities cited; direct to @grok without endorsement.
Cherry-Picked Data 1/5
No data presented at all.
Framing Techniques 3/5
Direct phrasing '@grok Är detta AI?' is neutral but implies skepticism toward potential AI fakes via pointed question.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No labeling of critics; no dissent mentioned.
Context Omission 4/5
'Är detta AI?' omits context of 'this' (likely media), leaving crucial details like source or description unspecified.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
No claims of unprecedented or shocking events; straightforward question lacks hype.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
Single short query with no repeated emotional words or phrases.
Manufactured Outrage 2/5
No outrage expressed or implied; calm question without disconnection from facts.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for immediate action; just a factual inquiry about AI generation with no pressure.
Emotional Triggers 3/5
The content poses a simple, neutral question '@grok Är detta AI?' without fear, outrage, or guilt-inducing language; no emotional triggers present.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Bandwagon Reductio ad hitlerum Appeal to fear-prejudice
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else