Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

3
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
80% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

🍓🍓🍓 on X

i’ve heard it said

Posted by 🍓🍓🍓
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No presentation of only two extreme options; no dilemma posed at all.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No us vs. them dynamics or group divisions; neutral content without tribal language.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
No good vs. evil framing; incomplete phrase lacks any narrative structure.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Timing appears organic with no suspicious links to recent events like Syrian conflicts or 2026 election prep; X posts show casual use without strategic patterns.
Historical Parallels 1/5
No resemblance to propaganda playbooks or state-sponsored patterns; hearsay generally exists in history but this phrase shows no specific matches.
Financial/Political Gain 1/5
No clear beneficiaries, organizations, or political alignments; searches found no financial interests, campaigns, or funding tied to 'i’ve heard it said'.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No claims of widespread agreement or 'everyone knows'; vague phrase without social proof.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No urgency or pressure for opinion change; searches show no trends, bots, or amplified pushes around the phrase.
Phrase Repetition 1/5
Unique and isolated; no similar framing or verbatim phrases across outlets, with X uses diverse and uncoordinated.
Logical Fallacies 1/5
No arguments or reasoning to contain fallacies; statement too brief.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts, authorities, or citations invoked; just anonymous hearsay.
Cherry-Picked Data 1/5
No data, facts, or selective evidence presented; purely vague.
Framing Techniques 2/5
Mild hearsay framing via 'i’ve heard it said' introduces unverified info neutrally, but no strong bias.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No mention of critics or labeling of dissenters; no substantive content to suppress.
Context Omission 3/5
What 'it' refers to is entirely omitted, leaving the statement incomplete and context-free.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
No unprecedented, shocking, or 'first-ever' claims; nothing novel in the generic phrase 'i’ve heard it said'.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional words or triggers; single neutral phrase with no repetition.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage expressed or implied; content disconnected from any facts or events, purely hearsay setup.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for immediate action or pressure; the vague statement lacks any call to respond.
Emotional Triggers 1/5
No fear, outrage, or guilt language present; the content 'i’ve heard it said' is a neutral introductory phrase without emotional triggers.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Appeal to fear-prejudice Doubt Reductio ad hitlerum
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else