Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

27
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
70% confidence
Moderate manipulation indicators. Some persuasion patterns present.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
Breaking News, Latest News and Videos | CNN
CNN

Breaking News, Latest News and Videos | CNN

View the latest news and breaking news today for U.S., world, weather, entertainment, politics and health at CNN.com.

By Monica Sarkar
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No binary choices like 'support ICE or chaos'; straightforward report.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 2/5
'Immigration officers' vs 'tensions flare' hints at enforcement-locals divide, mildly us-vs-them.
Simplistic Narratives 2/5
Deployment as response to shooting/tensions frames basic conflict without deeper nuance.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Direct response to Jan 7 shooting and protests; no distraction from other Jan 9-12 events per searches.
Historical Parallels 2/5
Echoes past ICE controversies with some AI disinfo on agent ID, but no strong psyop matches.
Financial/Political Gain 3/5
Supports Trump/Noem immigration enforcement politically amid crackdown; benefits hardline stance without clear financial gain.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No claims like 'everyone knows' or mass support for deployment.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 3/5
Post-shooting protests exploded nationally with coordinated actions; admin surges agents amid momentum.
Phrase Repetition 3/5
Identical phrasing in CNN/ABC/NYT headlines post-Noem statement suggests coordinated press rollout.
Logical Fallacies 1/5
No reasoning or arguments to critique; factual claim.
Authority Overload 1/5
No cited experts or officials beyond anonymous 'sources'.
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
'Around 1,000' may inflate reports of 'hundreds'; focuses on surge without arrest stats.
Framing Techniques 3/5
'Tensions flare' and 'fatal ICE shooting' emphasize drama/conflict over routine enforcement.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No labeling of protesters or critics negatively.
Context Omission 4/5
Omits Renee Good's name, self-defense context, 'hundreds' vs '1,000' variance, Noem's role, operation details; vague 'sources say'.
Novelty Overuse 2/5
'Around 1,000 more' presents scale without 'unprecedented' or shocking hype; tied to specific event.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional words; single use of 'tensions flare' without buildup.
Manufactured Outrage 2/5
'Tensions flare after fatal ICE shooting' links to real event without disconnected hyperbole.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No calls to act immediately, such as share, protest, or contact officials; purely informational headline.
Emotional Triggers 3/5
Phrase 'tensions flare' mildly evokes unease about conflict, but lacks intense fear, outrage, or guilt triggers like threats to safety.

What to Watch For

This messaging appears coordinated. Look for independent sources with different framing.

This content shows some manipulation indicators. Consider the source and verify key claims.

Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else