Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

14
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
71% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
Derfor bøyde Trump av: – Grønland-kravet kostet
VG

Derfor bøyde Trump av: – Grønland-kravet kostet

Donald Trump kan ha avlyst straffetollen mot Norge og Nato-allierte fordi prisen ble for høy.

By Jørn E Kaalstad; Alf Bjarne Johnsen
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No binary choices presented; discusses negotiations, 1951 agreement updates.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 2/5
Mild us-vs-them in quotes like Rynning's critique of Trump, but balanced with NATO cooperation.
Simplistic Narratives 2/5
Nuanced: notes economic pressures on Trump, NATO coordination, Danish sovereignty.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Coverage aligns directly with Davos events on Jan 20-22, 2026, confirmed as top news by Reuters, BBC; no suspicious ties to other events or historical disinfo patterns.
Historical Parallels 1/5
Echoes 2019 Trump-Greenland interest but no propaganda playbook matches; standard coverage across outlets.
Financial/Political Gain 1/5
Genuine VG journalism with expert Rynning quoted widely; no beneficiaries identified beyond public interest in NATO/Arctic security.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No claims of universal agreement; presents conflicting views like Trump's interest vs. Frederiksen's 'røde linje'.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 2/5
Organic X reactions to Davos news without coordinated pressure or astroturfing evident.
Phrase Repetition 2/5
Shared facts on tariff cancellation and 'framework deal' across Reuters, BBC, etc., but varied spins reflect normal news cycle.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Reasoning follows reported sequence without flaws like ad hominem beyond sourced opinions.
Authority Overload 1/5
Limited to credible expert Rynning and officials; no questionable citations.
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
Selective on Arctic threats but notes low recent sightings of Chinese/Russian activity.
Framing Techniques 3/5
Slightly skeptical tone in phrases like 'Grønland-kravet kostet ham', but quotes balanced sources.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
Includes Danish PM's firm stance and critiques of Chinese/Russian threats.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits some deal details but cites sources like NYT, AFP; notes 'ikke navngitte kilder'.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
No 'unprecedented' or shocking claims; events framed as ongoing developments like 'rammeverket for en avtale' tied to existing 1951 defense agreement.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional phrases; factual quotes from sources without amplification.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage beyond quotes like Rynning's 'lytter til seg selv'; grounded in reported events without exaggeration.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for reader action; purely informational summary of statements from Trump, Rutte, and Frederiksen.
Emotional Triggers 2/5
Minimal emotional language; neutral reporting on events like 'Trump avlyser straffetollen' without fear, outrage, or guilt triggers.

Identified Techniques

Name Calling, Labeling Loaded Language Doubt Repetition Whataboutism, Straw Men, Red Herring
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else