Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

12
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
70% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content

Source preview not available for this content.

Perspectives

Both Red and Blue Teams agree the content is a legitimate, low-manipulation indie game promotion using standard hype language and a transparent Steam link. Blue Team's higher confidence and verifiable evidence (e.g., Steam page) outweigh Red Team's milder caution, indicating minimal suspicion.

Key Points

  • Strong consensus on absence of manipulation patterns like fear, urgency, division, or deception.
  • Transparent intent via direct, verifiable Steam link to a real indie game, aligning with organic promo cycles.
  • Mild, proportionate hype ('emotional odyssey', 'gripping story') is standard for game marketing, not coercive.
  • Low-pressure CTA ('Add to your wishlist') lacks scarcity, bandwagon, or false dilemmas.
  • No political/tribal elements; purely apolitical entertainment promotion.

Further Investigation

  • Developer history (TomorrowHead Studio): past projects, funding, or promotion patterns.
  • Social media engagement metrics: organic vs. boosted reach, comment sentiment.
  • Full post context: platform algorithms, audience demographics, timing relative to industry events.

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No binary choices presented; optional wishlist add.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No us vs. them; neutral game invite to all.
Simplistic Narratives 2/5
Basic promo of story and scenery without good-evil framing.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Timing aligns with ongoing Steam playtests and trailers in Dec 2025-Jan 2026 for 2026 release, no suspicious ties to events like Iran protests or Florida primaries per searches.
Historical Parallels 1/5
No resemblance to propaganda like military games; standard indie adventure marketing unlike state-sponsored patterns.
Financial/Political Gain 1/5
Benefits indie developer TomorrowHead Studio via Steam wishlists, genuine self-funded promo with no political or hidden actors found in searches.
Bandwagon Effect 2/5
No claims of widespread agreement or popularity; just invites to wishlist.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No pressure for quick opinion change or trends; low-key X posts from gamers post-playtest show organic interest without amplification.
Phrase Repetition 2/5
Game coverage shares themes like northern exploration but diverse (e.g., playtest reviews, trailers) across X/Reddit, normal news cycle not coordinated disinfo.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Straightforward promo without arguments or flaws.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts or authorities cited.
Cherry-Picked Data 1/5
No data presented at all.
Framing Techniques 3/5
Positive biased words like 'odyssey,' 'gripping,' 'breathtaking' hype the game effectively.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No critics mentioned or labeled.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits release date, developer details, gameplay specifics beyond scenery/story, but typical for teaser promo.
Novelty Overuse 2/5
Phrases like 'breathtaking northern scenery' highlight appeal without 'unprecedented' or shocking claims.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional triggers; single use of 'emotional odyssey' and story mention.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage language or facts to disconnect from; purely positive promo.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
Simple 'Add to your wishlist' lacks any demand for immediate action or pressure.
Emotional Triggers 2/5
Mild hype with 'emotional odyssey' and 'gripping story' evokes interest but no fear, outrage, or guilt; standard game promo language.

Identified Techniques

Appeal to fear-prejudice Loaded Language Appeal to Authority Whataboutism, Straw Men, Red Herring Straw Man
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Analyze Something Else