Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

24
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
67% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Justin Francis on X

They’ll take away the SNX from sexy

Posted by Justin Francis
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 2/5
No explicit two extreme options presented; vague threat without alternatives.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 3/5
'They’ll take away' pits vague antagonists ('they') against implied victims holding SNX/sexy, fostering us-vs-them.
Simplistic Narratives 3/5
Frames a simplistic theft narrative: powerful 'they' stripping desirable 'SNX from sexy', good vs. evil without nuance.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Timing appears organic with no suspicious links to major events like immigration issues or Fed decisions; coincides with routine SNX delisting news.[web:0]
Historical Parallels 1/5
No similarities to known propaganda techniques or campaigns; isolated crypto-related phrase without psyop hallmarks.
Financial/Political Gain 1/5
No evident beneficiaries among politicians or companies; neutral reference to SNX amid standard crypto delisting without promotional ties.[web:0]
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No suggestions that 'everyone agrees' or widespread support; standalone cryptic claim.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No urgency or evidence of astroturfing; phrase not tied to trends or sudden public shifts on X or web.
Phrase Repetition 1/5
Unique wording not replicated elsewhere; SNX coverage exists but without matching framing or coordination.[web:0]
Logical Fallacies 3/5
Relies on unsubstantiated fear appeal assuming threat without evidence or reasoning.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts, sources, or authorities cited to bolster the claim.
Cherry-Picked Data 1/5
No data or statistics presented at all, selective or otherwise.
Framing Techniques 4/5
Biased language like 'take away' casts removal negatively, while 'sexy' adds manipulative allure to heighten emotional impact.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No labeling or dismissal of critics or opposing views.
Context Omission 4/5
Crucial details omitted: who 'they' are, what SNX and 'sexy' precisely mean, and context for the claim.
Novelty Overuse 3/5
The unusual phrasing 'take away the SNX from sexy' presents a potentially shocking claim without precedent or explanation, emphasizing novelty to grab attention.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No emotional triggers are repeated; the single short phrase lacks any reiteration.
Manufactured Outrage 3/5
Outrage is implied through the threat of removal but lacks factual grounding, potentially manufacturing concern over undefined 'they' and 'sexy'.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
The content makes no demands for immediate action, such as buying, selling, or protesting; it is merely a vague statement.
Emotional Triggers 4/5
The ominous warning 'They’ll take away the SNX from sexy' uses fear of loss and deprivation to manipulate emotions, implying something desirable ('sexy') is at risk.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Reductio ad hitlerum Doubt Appeal to fear-prejudice

What to Watch For

Notice the emotional language used - what concrete facts support these claims?
This content frames an 'us vs. them' narrative. Consider perspectives from 'the other side'.
Key context may be missing. What questions does this content NOT answer?
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else