Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

5
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
71% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Defiant L’s on X

Explain your political views with just one meme.

Posted by Defiant L’s
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No presentation of only two extreme options.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No us vs. them dynamics; neutral invitation without division.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
No good vs. evil framing; just a prompt for personal expression.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
No suspicious correlation with events like Davos 2026 or recent conflicts; one organic X post amid unrelated news.
Historical Parallels 1/5
No resemblance to propaganda like far-right meme radicalization; neutral unlike manipulative campaigns.
Financial/Political Gain 1/5
No evident beneficiaries or alignments; meme accounts use similar prompts for engagement, no funding ties found.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No suggestion that 'everyone agrees'; open to individual responses without pressure.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No urgency or manufactured momentum; isolated post without trends or amplification.
Phrase Repetition 1/5
Unique isolated prompt; no coordinated outlets or identical phrasing across sources.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
No arguments or reasoning to contain fallacies.
Authority Overload 1/5
No citations of experts or authorities.
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
No data presented at all, so no selective use.
Framing Techniques 2/5
Neutral wording without biased language choices.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No labeling of critics or suppression tactics.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits examples or context for 'political views,' potentially encouraging oversimplified meme responses without nuance.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
No claims of unprecedented or shocking revelations; straightforward prompt without hype.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional words or triggers; single neutral sentence.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage expressed or facts disconnected; lacks any emotional charge.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for immediate response or action; simply a casual suggestion to share a meme.
Emotional Triggers 1/5
No fear, outrage, or guilt language; the prompt 'Explain your political views with just one meme' is neutral and invitational.

Identified Techniques

Thought-terminating Cliches Bandwagon Appeal to Authority Flag-Waving Reductio ad hitlerum
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else