Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

41
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
68% confidence
Moderate manipulation indicators. Some persuasion patterns present.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

BRICS News on X

Source: https://t.co/P5RVgsYPVj pic.twitter.com/rFkd8lt6eZ

Posted by BRICS News
Linked Content
https://nypost.com/2026/01/10/world-news/us-used-powerful-sonic-weapon-in-venezuela-during-raid-to-capture-madouro-incredible-witness-account/
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No presentation of only two extreme options; focuses on one-sided raid description.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 2/5
Frames US as technologically superior heroes in 'daring raid' against 'dictator Nicolas Maduro' and his forces, creating us-vs-them dynamic.
Simplistic Narratives 2/5
Presents clear good-vs-evil: 20 advanced US troops slaughter 'hundreds' of helpless Venezuelans with mystery tech, no nuances.
Timing Coincidence 2/5
Published January 10 amid ongoing Venezuela news like Senate war powers vote around January 9 and Maduro's January 5 court appearance after January 3 raid, but appears as organic follow-up witness detail rather than distracting from specific events.
Historical Parallels 2/5
No strong ties to known campaigns like KGB AIDS disinformation or biolab narratives; superficial similarity to US secret weapon claims, but grounded in real raid context without propaganda playbook matches.
Financial/Political Gain 4/5
Amplification by Karoline Leavitt benefits Trump administration's image of unchallenged US power, deterring regional foes as guard warns 'no one wants to go through what we went through'; aligns with NY Post's conservative stance and Trump's oil control rhetoric.
Bandwagon Effect 2/5
Implies broad regional shift with guard's warning that 'everyone is already talking about this' and Latin America 'thinks twice,' but no explicit 'everyone agrees' claims.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 4/5
Viral X posts today with 'JUST IN' labels and Leavitt's high-engagement share create sudden momentum, pressuring perception of US dominance as guards warn others post-raid.
Phrase Repetition 4/5
Identical phrasing across NY Post, Daily Mail, AOL, Times of India, and 30+ X posts like 'We all started bleeding from the nose. Some were vomiting blood' within hours, indicating shared sourcing post-Leavitt share.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Assumes unverified witness proves secret weapon without corroboration; hasty generalization from one account to US invincibility.
Authority Overload 2/5
Relies on unnamed 'guard'/'witness account' without credentials; Leavitt shares but White House 'did not immediately respond.'
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
Selects dramatic guard quotes emphasizing US precision ('300 rounds per minute') and horror effects while ignoring broader raid verification.
Framing Techniques 4/5
'Dictator Nicolas Maduro,' 'jaw-dropping interview,' 'daring raid,' 'slaughter' bias toward US heroism and Venezuelan defeat.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No labeling of critics or alternative views; focuses solely on pro-US narrative.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits White House verification despite Leavitt's share, guard's identity, exact weapon details, and cuts off abruptly at 'An estim'; no casualties confirmation or raid context.
Novelty Overuse 4/5
Repeated emphasis on 'powerful mystery weapon,' 'unlike anything he has ever seen — or heard,' and 'technology unlike anything' frames the event as unprecedented and shocking.
Emotional Repetition 2/5
Emotional triggers like bleeding and vomiting appear a few times but without heavy looping; focus shifts to description rather than reiteration.
Manufactured Outrage 2/5
Horrific effects described but tied to a witness account without exaggeration beyond quotes; no clear disconnect from reported raid facts.
Urgent Action Demands 2/5
White House press secretary's caption 'Stop what you are doing and read this…' urges immediate attention, but lacks direct demands for reader action beyond reading.
Emotional Triggers 3/5
Vivid descriptions like 'bleeding through the nose,' 'vomiting blood,' and 'head was exploding from the inside' evoke horror and fear of the weapon's effects, heightening emotional impact on readers.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Doubt Thought-terminating Cliches Exaggeration, Minimisation

What to Watch For

Notice the emotional language used - what concrete facts support these claims?
Consider why this is being shared now. What events might it be trying to influence?
This messaging appears coordinated. Look for independent sources with different framing.
Key context may be missing. What questions does this content NOT answer?

This content shows some manipulation indicators. Consider the source and verify key claims.

Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else