Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

13
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
67% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Svenska Magasinet on X

Antalet resenärer ökade med 8,5 procent vid flygplatserna Málaga och Alicante-Elche 2025. via @aena ✍️ @JosefssonOla https://t.co/dwXfTHHC8l

Posted by Svenska Magasinet
Linked Content
https://svenskamagasinet.nu/nyheter/malaga-och-alicante-flygplats-satte-rekord-under-2025/
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No binary choices posed; discusses opportunities like 'många möjligheter... för hela näringslivet' openly.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No us-vs-them dynamics; neutral stats on nationalities like 'brittiska marknaden överst' without division.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
Presents balanced growth data across airports and markets without good-vs-evil framing.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Aena's stats release on January 13, 2026, matches routine annual reporting with no correlation to major events (e.g., no Spain-specific crises Jan 10-13); searches confirm organic timing amid global bulletins on unrelated issues like Syria.
Historical Parallels 1/5
Straightforward stats reporting shows no resemblance to propaganda tactics; no matches found in searches for similar disinformation on airport numbers or tourism.
Financial/Political Gain 2/5
Positive figures like '384,8 millones' benefit Aena (51% state-owned) and tourism broadly, but appear as standard corporate disclosure without disguised promotion for specific actors.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No claims of universal agreement; simply lists market breakdowns like 'tyskarna störst med 9 837 735' without implying 'everyone agrees.'
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
Factual reporting on '4,2 procent' growth lacks urgency or pressure; X amplification is low-engagement, no manufactured trends or astroturfing evident.
Phrase Repetition 2/5
Identical stats ('26 760 549 passagerare' for Málaga) echoed across outlets and X from Aena's release, but with diverse framing (e.g., local vs. national focus), normal for official data.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Reasoning is straightforward stats linkage (e.g., passengers to business opportunities) without flaws like false cause.
Authority Overload 1/5
Quotes one airport chief ('Pedro Bendala') credibly on 'mycket bra år' without overloading questionable experts.
Cherry-Picked Data 3/5
Highlights top performers (Málaga, Alicante '8,5 procent') and markets (UK, Germany) while noting lesser growth like Palma's '1,5 procent,' but skips underperformers.
Framing Techniques 3/5
Uses positive terms like 'stark utveckling,' 'rekord,' and 'récord histórico' to emphasize growth over neutral reporting.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No mention of critics; purely positive stats without labeling dissenters.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits potential downsides like capacity issues or comparisons to pre-pandemic peaks, focusing only on increases and records.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
While noting 'nytt årsrekord' for Málaga and 'récord histórico' for Aena, claims are grounded in specific figures without excessive 'unprecedented' hype.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional triggers; phrasing like 'ökade med 8,5 procent' appears once per airport without redundancy.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage expressed or evoked; content factually states growth like 'Palma de Mallorca ökade med 1,5 procent' without disconnected anger.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for immediate action; it neutrally shares statistics such as '384 837 183' passengers and quotes airport chief on opportunities.
Emotional Triggers 2/5
The content reports factual increases like '8,5 procent' and 'nytt årsrekord' without fear, outrage, or guilt-inducing language.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Name Calling, Labeling Repetition Doubt Slogans
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else