Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

35
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
74% confidence
Moderate manipulation indicators. Some persuasion patterns present.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

«Любарт» 20та бригада оперативного призначення НГУ on X

In the 20th Operational Brigade Lubart of the First Corps Azov, we systematically destroy the enemy, employing all available military means and resources. Choose the weapon you will use to strike the occupier today. This is your country. This is your difficulty level. pic.twitter.com/sovALo08d3

Posted by «Любарт» 20та бригада оперативного призначення НГУ
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 3/5
'This is your country. This is your difficulty level' implies join fight or lose homeland, limiting options.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 3/5
'Strike the occupier' frames Russians as enemy vs. 'your country,' fostering us-vs-them dynamics.
Simplistic Narratives 4/5
Reduces conflict to 'destroy the enemy' in 'your country,' good (defenders) vs. evil (occupier) binary.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Post on Jan 20, 2026, coincides with Russian energy strikes (ISW/Al Jazeera reports), but reflects organic recruitment amid constant war, with no suspicious correlation to distract from negotiations or events.
Historical Parallels 2/5
Gamified language ('Choose the weapon... your difficulty level') mirrors Ukrainian ad evolution to career appeals (NYT), not foreign psyops like Russian IRA patterns.
Financial/Political Gain 2/5
Benefits Ukrainian National Guard and Azov politically by boosting recruitment; funded via state/donations, no evidence of specific companies or politicians gaining financially.
Bandwagon Effect 2/5
'We systematically destroy the enemy' implies brigade success to encourage joining, but no 'everyone agrees' pressure.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No urgency for opinion change or astroturfing; normal engagement on official post amid steady Ukraine war discourse.
Phrase Repetition 2/5
Similar motivational videos from Lubart and units like 225th Regiment; diverse framing in war coverage, no verbatim coordination.
Logical Fallacies 3/5
Appeal to patriotism ('This is your country') and emotion over evidence for joining.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts, officials, or authorities cited; relies on brigade's implicit credibility.
Cherry-Picked Data 2/5
No data presented, so no selective cherry-picking evident.
Framing Techniques 4/5
'Occupier' and gaming terms like 'difficulty level' bias toward heroic resistance narrative.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No mention of critics or labeling dissenters negatively.
Context Omission 4/5
Omits risks, training details, or casualties; focuses only on destruction and choice without full context.
Novelty Overuse 2/5
No claims of unprecedented events or shocking novelties; focuses on routine brigade operations without hype.
Emotional Repetition 2/5
Emotional triggers like enemy destruction appear once without repetition for emphasis.
Manufactured Outrage 2/5
Outrage at 'the occupier' ties directly to Russia's invasion, not disconnected from verifiable conflict facts.
Urgent Action Demands 3/5
'Choose the weapon you will use to strike the occupier today' demands immediate personal involvement, creating pressure to act now amid ongoing war.
Emotional Triggers 4/5
Phrases like 'systematically destroy the enemy' and 'strike the occupier' evoke outrage against invaders and patriotic fervor, appealing to emotions of defense and national pride.

Identified Techniques

Appeal to fear-prejudice Name Calling, Labeling Doubt Reductio ad hitlerum Loaded Language

What to Watch For

Notice the emotional language used - what concrete facts support these claims?
This content frames an 'us vs. them' narrative. Consider perspectives from 'the other side'.
Key context may be missing. What questions does this content NOT answer?

This content shows some manipulation indicators. Consider the source and verify key claims.

Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else