Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

8
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
74% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

Luis Catacora on X

new pfp for @moltbot pic.twitter.com/GowxpFsaU7

Posted by Luis Catacora
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No dilemmas or extreme options presented.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No us-vs-them dynamics or group divisions; neutral mention of one account.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
No good-vs-evil framing; too brief for narratives.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Moltbot virality peaked in the past 72 hours with widespread X posts and articles on its AI agent features, aligning organically with the hype rather than distracting from major events like elections or announcements.
Historical Parallels 1/5
No similarities to propaganda techniques or known campaigns; searches found zero matches for this benign pfp announcement.
Financial/Political Gain 2/5
Vague links to crypto like $openclaw token amid Moltbot buzz, but no clear beneficiaries promoted; appears genuine sharing without paid or political operation.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No suggestions of consensus or 'everyone agrees'; no social proof invoked.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 2/5
Broader Moltbot topic surged rapidly with high-engagement posts, but this content applies no urgency or pressure for belief change.
Phrase Repetition 1/5
Unique phrasing with no verbatim matches across sources; general Moltbot coverage lacks coordinated talking points.
Logical Fallacies 1/5
No arguments or reasoning to contain fallacies.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts, sources, or authorities cited.
Cherry-Picked Data 1/5
No data or evidence presented to cherry-pick.
Framing Techniques 3/5
'New pfp' subtly frames the change positively as fresh or improved, using casual slang without overt bias.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No mention of critics or labeling of dissenters.
Context Omission 4/5
Crucial details omitted, such as the poster's identity, old vs. new pfp differences, @moltbot context, or image description, leaving audience to infer.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
No 'unprecedented' or 'shocking' claims; a routine profile picture update lacks hype.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
Single brief sentence with no repeated emotional triggers or emphasis.
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage expressed or implied; casual tone disconnected from any controversy.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No calls to action or demands; merely shares an image link without instructing the audience.
Emotional Triggers 1/5
No fear, outrage, or guilt language present; the content is a straightforward, neutral announcement: 'new pfp for @moltbot'.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Reductio ad hitlerum Name Calling, Labeling Appeal to fear-prejudice Thought-terminating Cliches
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else