Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

4
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
71% confidence
Low manipulation indicators. Content appears relatively balanced.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

fofr on X

Still lots of improvements possible in the video quality and coherency, but I like where this is going. "always be promptin'" https://t.co/LVP42OI7nC pic.twitter.com/QLccbbNWWq

Posted by fofr
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No presentation of only two extreme options.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 1/5
No us vs. them dynamics; focuses on personal AI experimentation.
Simplistic Narratives 1/5
No good vs. evil framing; balanced view of improvements needed and progress.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Timing appears organic as a casual AI researcher share amid unrelated news like Trump Davos remarks and global conflicts; no links to events or disinfo patterns.
Historical Parallels 1/5
No propaganda resemblance; 'always be promptin'' is a lighthearted AI prompting meme, unrelated to psyops.
Financial/Political Gain 1/5
No clear beneficiaries; Google DeepMind employee's personal post on tools like LTX lacks promotional or political intent.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No suggestions that 'everyone agrees' or claims of widespread consensus.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No pressure for opinion change; low-engagement post lacks urgency, trends, or amplification.
Phrase Repetition 1/5
Unique perspective from one user; no coordinated identical messaging across sources.
Logical Fallacies 2/5
Minor unsubstantiated optimism in 'I like where this is going' without evidence, but largely descriptive.
Authority Overload 1/5
No cited experts or authorities.
Cherry-Picked Data 1/5
No data presented at all, selective or otherwise.
Framing Techniques 3/5
Positively frames AI video as promising despite flaws via pun 'always be promptin'' and phrase 'I like where this is going.'
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No labeling of critics; no dissent mentioned.
Context Omission 3/5
Omits details like exact LTX model specs, full generation process, or tool availability; assumes AI community familiarity.
Novelty Overuse 1/5
No claims of 'unprecedented' or shocking breakthroughs; acknowledges 'lots of improvements possible' in quality.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional words or triggers; single mild positive note 'I like where this is going.'
Manufactured Outrage 1/5
No outrage expressed or evoked; neutral assessment of video flaws and potential.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No demands for immediate action; simply shares a video demo with personal enthusiasm.
Emotional Triggers 1/5
No fear, outrage, or guilt language present; content is casually positive about AI progress without emotional triggers.

Identified Techniques

Loaded Language Reductio ad hitlerum Name Calling, Labeling Appeal to Authority Appeal to fear-prejudice
Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else