Skip to main content

Influence Tactics Analysis Results

29
Influence Tactics Score
out of 100
73% confidence
Moderate manipulation indicators. Some persuasion patterns present.
Optimized for English content.
Analyzed Content
X (Twitter)

AI Guides on X

Business consultants charge $10K for this. ChatGPT does it in 10 minutes: → Interviews you → Creates a tailored business concept → Names it → Lists startup costs → Gives you a launch plan Comment "Creator" and I'll DM it. pic.twitter.com/Xx6uENk3o3

Posted by AI Guides
View original →

Analysis Factors

Confidence
False Dilemmas 1/5
No binary choices; presents AI as easy alternative without forcing options.
Us vs. Them Dynamic 2/5
Mild 'us' (DIY AI users) vs 'them' (pricey consultants), but not divisive.
Simplistic Narratives 2/5
Simplifies to AI good/fast/free vs consultants expensive, overlooking nuances.
Timing Coincidence 1/5
Timing organic with no link to past 72-hour news (Iran events, US incidents) or upcoming announcements; routine AI promo post.
Historical Parallels 1/5
No propaganda hallmarks; standard social media hustle tactic, absent state disinfo patterns.
Financial/Political Gain 4/5
@free_ai_guides/@godofprompt gains leads from DM requests for monetized AI content; mirrors financial playbook of similar accounts building sales lists.
Bandwagon Effect 1/5
No claims like 'everyone's doing it' or popularity stats; individual promo.
Rapid Behavior Shifts 1/5
No momentum-building or conversion pressure; lacks trends, bots, or astroturfing signals.
Phrase Repetition 4/5
Verbatim elements like 'consultants charge $Xk' and 'Comment X for DM' recur across accounts (e.g., @Meer_AIIT's $300K version), indicating copied marketing script.
Logical Fallacies 3/5
False equivalence between full consulting and simplistic prompts; unproven claim of identical value.
Authority Overload 1/5
No experts, studies, or endorsements cited.
Cherry-Picked Data 3/5
Spotlights '$10K' extreme fee while ignoring affordable/free business resources or AI shortcomings.
Framing Techniques 4/5
Biased with '$10K' exaggeration, benefit arrows '→', and direct call 'Comment "Creator"' to prompt engagement.
Suppression of Dissent 1/5
No critics or counterarguments addressed.
Context Omission 4/5
Omits ChatGPT limitations, real startup risks/failures, prompt quality variability, and that consultants provide more than prompts.
Novelty Overuse 3/5
Highlights 'ChatGPT does it in 10 minutes' as novel replacement for consultants, but AI business tools are commonplace by 2026.
Emotional Repetition 1/5
No repeated emotional triggers; single mention of '$10K' without reinforcement.
Manufactured Outrage 2/5
No outrage; factual contrast between high fees and AI speed, not exaggerated or fact-free.
Urgent Action Demands 1/5
No urgency tactics like time limits; merely invites 'Comment "Creator" and I'll DM it' without pressure.
Emotional Triggers 2/5
Minimal emotional language; contrasts '$10K' consultant fees with free ChatGPT access, evoking mild greed or FOMO but no fear, outrage, or guilt.

Identified Techniques

Name Calling, Labeling Bandwagon Loaded Language Appeal to fear-prejudice Slogans

What to Watch For

This messaging appears coordinated. Look for independent sources with different framing.
Key context may be missing. What questions does this content NOT answer?

This content shows some manipulation indicators. Consider the source and verify key claims.

Was this analysis helpful?
Share this analysis
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn
Analyze Something Else